Gunnar Hämmerle was part of the first generation of street style bloggers, a select few amateur documentarians of urban hip, who survived the initial wave of excitement for street style blogs back in the mid-'00s as well as its inevitable backlash. His Munich-based blog Style Clicker helped launch his career as a commercial photographer and made Gunnar part of an international blogging elite, jet-setting from fashion week to fashion week, photographing many of the biggest names in fashion, and partnering with a wide variety of brands. Now, Gunnar is attempting to reclaim some of the original mission of his blog. He has taken it "back to its roots," shooting for the first time in a long time in Munich itself, and focusing on "real" people on the streets, rather than pre-established style icons at fashion shows. Last week we talked via Skype about his passions as a photographer, his quest for street style authenticity, and his thoughts about what street style blogging has become. Here is a condensed and edited version of our conversation.
Brent: I’ve
noticed that your blog, Style Clicker, has undergone a major renovation
recently. Your photos are now in black and white. They are portrait shots that
you have to click through in order to see the full body shot. And you no longer
do advertisements or post sponsored content. Can you tell me about your
motivations behind the relaunch?
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Gunnar: First of
all, I felt that it was time to do something new. I had been doing the
blog for almost six years, and it just felt like I needed a change somehow. I
felt a lack of motivation to go on as I did before. And so there were different
possibilities. I thought either of stopping the blog altogether or maybe giving
it away or selling it, or, alternatively, of changing something about it so
that I would have fun with it again. It was also at that time that I tried converting
some of the old photos to black and white, and I found out that I really liked
the effect. It was a different angle, or a different point of view for looking
at fashion. In black and white, time and location is not so important. And it’s no so much about fashion anymore. It’s
more about the people. I then enhanced the focus on people by posting the
portrait shots first and making it so that, in order to see the full dress, you
have to click on the portrait shot.
I think that for me this was a natural development. When I
started the blog, I was mainly interested in the people I was photographing. I
did not come from fashion. Fashion was simply the running thread of the blog, a
theme that I figured many people would be interested in, and it was a way of narrowing
down my focus when choosing people to shoot. Plus, it was a good excuse to
shoot people I did not know in the street. So that was good.
But it was not so much that I was deeply into fashion when I
started. It was through the blog that I had the opportunity to step into that
world. But I saw myself with one foot in the fashion world and the other out. I was an insider, but I was also an
outsider at the same time.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Brent: And over
time has that become a more difficult position to occupy?
Gunnar: Yeah. Because
the competition is quite thick now. I don’t want to talk about “the good old
times,” but I think that back then those blogs that really became big all had a
unique way of looking at the whole topic. And they were of high quality.
Otherwise they wouldn’t have been successful. I think that maybe many people
these days just start street style blogs without caring so much about the
quality of their pictures or the quality of who they pick. They just want to be
a part of the hype. And it’s a bit strange, for example, in Paris at the runway
shows now. There’s more photographers
than people to shoot. It’s almost
like paparazzo. Or like a war almost. And it’s not so much fun for me
anymore.
However, next week I will go to Paris Fashion Week again,
and try it out again, because I have not been for a while, as I was fed up with
the whole situation. But now I think it might be interesting to me again because
of the whole black and white thing. I don’t know if it will work or not, but
I’ll see.
Brent: And now
that you have taken this new approach to your blog, do you think you’re going
to be photographing different types of people at Paris Fashion Week? Will it
affect how you approach taking the picture in the first place?
Gunnar: Not so
much actually, because I have always picked people for my photographs by just a
gut feeling. Of course, when I went to fashion weeks, it was more of the fashion
people that I would shoot, because that was who were hanging out there. It’s
not like that authentic, shooting people on the street thing.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
I mean, the reason I shot these people at fashion week was
mainly that it became my job to do so. And so, of course I knew that I could
sell more pictures to the magazines, and I make my living through that, so it
was easier at the fashion weeks. People dress
up [at fashion week] because they want to be photographed by as many fashion bloggers as
possible. So it’s not the authenticity that was once the strength of street
style blogs. That sort of went away. And I want to try to get it back again.
That’s why I now take pictures here in Munich again, which I have not done so often during the last few years, because I traveled so much. When
I was at home I just didn’t feel like going out there. Now it’s sort of like I’m going back to the roots.
Brent: So after
shooting fashion weeks for such a long time, and after doing so much travel for
major fashion events, where the dynamic is different for taking pictures, is it
difficult to go from that — where you almost have people lining up to get their
picture taken — to combing the streets of Munich, being patient, and looking
for those individuals who stand out? Is it hard to transition from one type of
street style to the other?
Gunnar: No. I
don’t think so. I mean, I like it better strolling around on the streets. I’ve always called myself a professional
walker, or a flâneur, like you say in French. That actually pretty much
describes what it was, from the moment at least that I set myself free from
extremely wanting a picture. Now if I go
out for a walk and I get a picture it’s nice, and if not, I had a nice walk.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Brent: Let’s step
back to the very beginning, back to 2006 when you started. First of all, what
inspired you to start the blog? And how did you go about starting it?
Gunnar: I was
researching for another project. We wanted to do some sort of platform where
people could load up pictures of themselves or friends, a bit like LookBook. But
during that research, I came across some street style blogs. There weren’t that
many. There were maybe ten or twenty. And I thought, well, that’s a nice idea.
I thought, I will try that in Munich. Which is not a fashion city, but for me,
like I said, it was not really about fashion, and I always like to talk more about style than fashion, anyway because
fashion has a connotation for me of some trend or something that is just for one
season and then gone again. And I think style is more timeless. And that is more what I’m interested in.
Brent: Sure. And
what was it like going out your first time to do it?
Gunnar: It was
quite hard actually. I mean, the first picture was of my wife, but it was not a
typical picture for my blog. I shot it with a flash at home in the cellar, and
just to have it on a card to give to the people I shoot, so that it was more
official. I thought that it might be a bit difficult [to get people to pose for me] because back then
when you came up to people and said you wanted to take a picture of them for
the internet, they immediately thought it was for porn. They didn’t know about
blogs or anything like that at that time. You had to explain more what it was
all about. And probably also if you are a bit shy, and I am, it’s not always so
easy to stop a stranger and ask them for a photo. It’s easier now for me.
Although I still have the feeling that it always depends on if you’re having a
good day or a bad day. If I’m in a good mood, it’s very easy to ask people, and
they will all say "yes." And if I’m in a bad mood, probably the first one is
going to say “no.” I now know that I shouldn’t go out shooting when I’m not feeling
good.
Brent: Before you
did the relaunch of your blog you had a relatively significant amount of
sponsored and paid content, and I’m just curious what your feelings and
thoughts are about sponsored content on blogs.
Gunnar: Well, I think it’s okay as long as they
are marked as sponsored content. I don’t like sponsored content that, as a
reader, I cannot identify as sponsored content. Actually, that is not legal [either].
But I think it’s quite common. I think it’s no problem if it’s sponsored, so
long as it is content readers are interested in, and that has been my experience.
I also have sponsored posts, and these posts get many “like”s on Facebook. So it’s not that readers do not like sponsored
content. It’s just that they don’t like to be fooled. And they want to have
content that is valuable in a way. Sponsored content should also be good
content.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Brent: Are there
particular photographers, or perhaps magazines or blogs that have really
influenced the way you shoot your images?
Gunnar: Well, the
blog that most interested me when I started was Hel Looks. It had to be. I
really liked the static way they shot their pictures. And I also liked that
they did not so much pick the fashion people, more like people with a unique
style. I really loved that blog. It was a major influence on me. And other
photographers I also very much like. [Turn-of-the-century German photographer
of everyday people] August Sander, for example, but I found out about him after I started. I
mean, I had heard about him before, but I was not consciously trying to take
pictures as he did. It was more that I found out that certain aspects of
formality are quite similar in his photos and in the photos I take. Also, Rineke Dijkstra. I like the pictures she’s
doing. It’s always the stillness and the concentration on the subject that I
like about pictures of those photographers.
Brent: How important do you think it is what kind of camera or equipment street
style photographers use?
Gunnar: I think that it’s good to have a good camera. I started with a point and
shoot and that worked out for the beginning, but at a certain point I switched
to a full-frame SLR. It’s just much better quality, and you see this in the
pictures. Now all the street style photographers have very good equipment, so it’s almost not possible anymore to go out
there with a point and shoot and compete with the other ones. Actually, I
have now downgraded, to a camera that is still high quality, but not
full-frame, because full-frame is always so heavy, and I didn’t like to have it
with me all the time. It’s a Fuji X-Pro 1, which is a very great camera in
terms of image quality. It’s almost like a SLR.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Brent: What kind of lens do you prefer to use?
Gunnar: For a 35mm camera, I prefer a 50mm lens, the normal focal length, which is most
like the way the human eye perceives the world.
Brent: Do you use the same camera for both street style work and professional
work?
Gunnar: No. For professional work I use a Nikon D800, and when it’s necessary, a
medium format. The Fuji’s more for the streets.
Brent: Do you think people react to you differently when you’re using a smaller
camera?
Gunnar: Yeah, I think so. Because the other camera is quite big, I think it’s
better to have a smaller one [for street style]. It gives you a larger sense of
intimacy. But maybe for jobs it’s the other way around. It has to be a certain
size before people respect the professional work.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
Gunnar: Usually it was through the blog. I would be contacted by PR agencies asking
to do projects for their clients. It was a bit of a mixture of everything.
Sometimes it was exhibitions or it was
photo shoots. All different kinds of things. And that was very good, because I
didn’t have to acquire clients. They just came through the blog.
But it was also a
major step [in a different direction] that I did a relaunch that makes the
blog, let’s say, very uninteresting for the industry. There’s no space for
advertising anymore. I just think that
the peak of the whole blog thing is over. Now it’s more of an industry. There are many many people doing it,
and of course it will not go away anymore. I’m sure about that. It’s just a
different channel of communication for fashion. But it’s not avant garde
anymore. I think it will be harder also for people doing blogs to make a
living. And I think it’s good for the bloggers to be thinking about what else they can do.
That was one of
the reasons I did the relaunch. I took stock of my situation and thought, “Okay
I will concentrate on my photography and use the blog mainly as part of my
portfolio.” It’s not so much about having banners on the blog anymore. It’s simply
not that much money you make through banners. I mean, unless you’re very very
big. You have to be The Sartorialist to
get rich through that.
Brent: How long was it before you were able to quit your day job and make
photography your full-time occupation?
Gunnar: I think when I started it was about one and a half years before it really
became a job. And I was quite lucky. First of all, there was not so many
competitors out there, and then I had a collaboration with Condé Nast for their digital formats in
Germany, and I supplied them with pictures for GQ and Glamour and Vogue. That made it possible for me to
travel so much. I had a fixed stipend every month and could go to different
cities, and through that it became a job in a way.
Brent: So what do you see the future of street style photography being? Or is
there a future, after what you said?
Gunnar: Well, I think it’s much more commercial. And that’s okay. I think the fashion industry took the right
steps to gain control over the fashion bloggers. When it all started it was something that was of out of the control of the
industry, and I think now they are back in control. That’s why I think that
it’s not so free anymore, and it’s not so authentic as it was in the beginning.
Nonetheless, I
still love the possibilities that blogging gives you. And I think it’s just a
great thing. You can reach the whole world with your work. You don’t need
any big investment or anything like that. You can just start something, and
blog about something that you are passionate about. That is a great thing.
Most of the succesful bloggers, they started
out of passion. Now a lot of the younger bloggers just want to have fame,
and that’s their main preoccupation. I don’t think that will work. So, yeah, blogging is great, but it should
be passionate.
 |
| Image by Gunnar Hämmerle. Posted originally on Styleclicker.net |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.